Can I use stable/etcd-operator instead of incubator/etcd
Closed this issue · 2 comments
Elexy commented
I ran into the rejoining issue mentioned in the docs and was wondering if it should be possible (in theory) to use the etcd-operator as the storage backend?
lwolf commented
Yes, the latest master (v0.2.0) of this chart does not require incubator/etcd anymore. So etcd could be provisioned using any suitable method.
Elexy commented
For anyone landing here, the stable etcd-operator chart works well with this chart. It does require some name changing to resolve to the right etcd service. The etcd-operator is exposed as etcd-cluster-client
. Random pod killing now doesn't take stolon down anymore.