Can I use stable/etcd-operator instead of incubator/etcd

Question

Can I use stable/etcd-operator instead of incubator/etcd

Closed this issue 7 years ago · 2 comments

I ran into the rejoining issue mentioned in the docs and was wondering if it should be possible (in theory) to use the etcd-operator as the storage backend?

Answer 1 · 2017-06-27T11:14:42.000Z

Yes, the latest master (v0.2.0) of this chart does not require incubator/etcd anymore. So etcd could be provisioned using any suitable method.

Answer 2 · 2017-08-05T07:00:02.000Z

For anyone landing here, the stable etcd-operator chart works well with this chart. It does require some name changing to resolve to the right etcd service. The etcd-operator is exposed as etcd-cluster-client. Random pod killing now doesn't take stolon down anymore.