Wouldn´t wrap the whole thing in docker environment solve many runtime issues ?
CyberSeppi opened this issue · 3 comments
Hi there,
just wanted to ask if this wouldn´t be a good thing to have ?
Spin up docker, put the configuration in a locally mounted volume and start testing ?
Thanks and greetings,
Julian
I'm not sure exactly what runtime issues you're thinking of. Are you suggesting we add a dockerfile and publish an image built from it? To make Logstash available from within a container created from that image I guess there are two options:
- Base the LFV image on a Logstash image and publish one image per Logstash version.
- Base the LFV image on a stripped-down Linux (with a JVM) and ask people to mount a directory with the desired Logstash from the host.
Or did you have something else in mind?
Hi,
I guess I just misunderstood how to use this :-(
Thought I would have to need some kind of run time environment around it, to make it work.
My bad, sorry for disturbing :-)
I´ll test it straight away. Have a good weekend and cheers,
Julian
Thought I would have to need some kind of run time environment around it, to make it work.
Well, an operating system is mandatory :-)
My bad, sorry for disturbing :-)
No problem.