maning/osmphgps

6 san fernando's are missing on your current compiler version

Closed this issue · 9 comments

The latest OSMPH-Garmin (20110311, mkgmap index v1860) has only one San Fernando (from Bukidnon)

Can you try using mkgmap r1867?

Our OSM beta (compiled on mkgmap r1867) has at least 7 San Fernando in city seach result from provinces of: Bukidnon, Camarines Sur, Cebu, La Union, Masbate, Pampanga, Romblon.

Is this problem appears only with San Fernando or other towns/cities as well?

Using Mac RoadTrip (V 2.0.2) and BaseCamp (V. 3.1.2) Search Cities, I can find all San Fernando (towns/cities).

Using Mapsource (V. 6.11.6), under the Find Places, I search for San Fernando gives 1 result in Bukidnon. Using the Find Nearest Places > Cities, all San Fernando are found.

Using nuvi 1310, only San Fernando, Bukidnon, PHL is avalaibale in the City search.

Confirmed that all San Fernando's are searcheable with mkgmap r1867

Compiled using the mkgmap-city-region-index-r1992. @ralleon, please test.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/607635/osm-ph_gps_maps/dev/osmph_winmapsource_latest_dev.exe

on quick testing, all San Fernando's appear on city-search on Nuvi 1310,
yehey.

address search is working on Nuvi 1310 (no more annoying 'no map data
available'. nice :-)

possible bug: the museum & historical category on Nuvi1310 returns Sitios
and Subdivisions.

Will do further testing later... medyo busy lang today. I'll give you an
update tomorrow. excited.... :-)

I compiled using my beta style under the latest
mkgmap-city-region-index-r1992, with same result on nuvi1310:
-no problem with similarly-named cities
-working address search
-same problem with Museum category on nuvi 1310 ---- it returns subdivision
and villages instead of museum. I guess it's just a minor style adjustment &
hex reassignment. I'll investigate that later.

We just need confirmations from users of nuvi 760 14xx 12xx Oregon if they
have no problem with San Fernando's and Address Search

We are almost there! :-)
(I can return your nuvi 1310 later, no further testing needed)

OK, great news! We can perhaps send a message to the beta testers.
And then squash a few issues (minor hex assigns and typ) then public
release?