[JOSS REVIEW] State of the field
Closed this issue · 1 comments
finsberg commented
The joss paper is missing a section about the State of the field where you compare your software to other commonly-used packages.
This is related to openjournals/joss-reviews#5744
marchirschvogel commented
Thanks, I've updated the paper.md file accordingly, and included a paragraph under the "Statement of need" section on other open source solvers tailored towards cardiac mechanics. Please let me know if you feel that I've forgotten to mention any other important package(s).