Vanilla HCN accuracy
Closed this issue · 3 comments
Thanks for the neat implementation.
I've run the provided code but couldn't get the reported accuracy, 88.12%. I got 81.1%.
Have you applied any other data post-processing for NTU-D, such as normalization, other than the code (interpolation, set hip to zero)?
Have you seen a result similar to mine by any chance from your previous experiments? If so, would you give me a hint to train the network properly?
Hi @sangwoo3,
Did you change something in the code or just clone it and run it?
I will check the issue and result deviations I find.
However, I am little busy these days, so maybe it takes a week.
Best Max
Hi @sangwoo3 ,
I rerun the experiments from scratch and came to results very similar to my previous ones.
I updated the README and added setups for cross-view and cross-subject. Maybe you run the experiments on cross-subject?
Vanilla HCN @ 200 Epochs | Cross-View | Cross-Subject |
---|---|---|
Accuracy | 89.5 % | 83.8 % |
Top-2 accuracy | 95.65 % | 91.7 % |
Top-5 accuracy | 98.79 % | 97.2 % |
I will later add updated experiments for Prototype-HCN.
If you can provide more details, maybe we can find your issue.
Best,
Max
Since there is no response, I'll close the issue. We can reopen it if it's necessary.