LICENSE.md missing

[etodanik]

I am currently basing some code on this repo, and it would be great if there was clarity on the licensing of the code :)

[lorisleiva]

Thanks for raising this. We already had the "MIT" license mentioned in the package.json but not on the repository so we fixed this.

[etodanik]

Perfect! What's your preferred way of code attribution? I'm borrowing large chunks of your Rust visitor for my C++ visitors. For files that are mostly your code with minor alterations I do something like:

Let me know if that's OK or if you have any preferences to how you like to be attributed in code.

[lorisleiva]

Yeah that's fine. 👍