Sequence/regex schemas

[ikitommi]

From slack:

like clojure.spec.alpha/conform, there could be something for that? Explain could return either failures or real values if no errors exist.

 (->
   [:cat
    [:x int?]
    [:y int?]
    [:rest [:* string?]]]
   [1 2 "kikka" "kukka"]
  (m/explain)
  (mu/humanize))
 ; {:x 1
 ;  :y 2
 ;  :rest ("kikka "kukka")}

and/or, an anonymous variant:

 (m/valid?
   [:cat int? int? [:* string?]]
   [1 2 "kikka" "kukka"])
 ; => true

using for example https://github.com/cgrand/seqexp under the hoods

[green-coder]

When designing it, the scenario of implementing the equivalent of clojure.alpha.spec/unform might also be considered.

For info, I would use both conform and unform if malli has it.

[ikitommi]

Related issues:

• cgrand/seqexp#11
• cgrand/seqexp#9

[ikitommi]

Initial internal impl done, just 123loc. need to add tests and figure out how to expose the parsing api in general.

[ikitommi]

Master!