Change to code that doesn't use boost
neoarc opened this issue · 1 comments
neoarc commented
I don't know if this is an unreasonable demand.
While reviewing the use of this IPC library, I was asked if boost was absolutely necessary.
At this point, most of them can be replaced by standards such as c++17.
The internal code is well written, but the usability is not the best.
How do you think?
larsonmpdx commented
all of the shared memory stuff is boost::interprocess, I don't think that's in c++17