Unidiomatic use of `Result::and_then` in README

[ruifengx]

Currently the code in the README:

fn main() -> ::windows::core::Result<()> {
    bootstrap::initialize()
        .and_then(|_| {
            println!(
                "Remaining charge: {}%",
                PowerManager::RemainingChargePercent()?
            );
            Ok(())
        })
        .and_then(|_| bootstrap::uninitialize())
}

I strongly suggest replacing it with the following:

fn main() -> ::windows::core::Result<()> {
    bootstrap::initialize()?;
    println!(
        "Remaining charge: {}%",
        PowerManager::RemainingChargePercent()?,
    );
    bootstrap::uninitialize()
}

I personally cannot think of any reason preventing the use of the ? operator, because it is already used in the original example. I would go even further to suggest the following:

fn main() -> ::windows::core::Result<()> {
    bootstrap::initialize()?;
    let power = PowerManager::RemainingChargePercent()?;
    println!("Remaining charge: {power}%");
    bootstrap::uninitialize()
}