Returns all items when bounds provided to search contains center 0,0

[gitcatrat]

I'm using a standard scene coordinate system where 0,0 is center and coordinates go from -50,000 to 50,000 in both x and y.
That means that some of the items have negative coordinates, some positives.

But I discovered a curious issue: if bounds for tree.search(bounds) "wrap" 0,0, search returns all the items.

I'll add my extension in case it could affect it but I doubt it:

class RTree extends RBush {
  toBBox(item) {
    return {
      minX: item.x,
      minY: item.y,
      maxX: item.x + item.width,
      maxY: item.y + item.height,
    }:
  }

  compareMinX(a, b) { return a.x - b.x; }
  compareMinY(a, b) { return a.y - b.y; }
}

Item structure:

const item = {
  x: -1000,
  y: -500,
  width: 100,
  height: 50,
  // a lot of irrelevant members
}

[IvanSanchez]

Can you publish a fiddle/codepen/plunkr that displays this behaviour?

[gitcatrat]

@IvanSanchez Thanks for the push to replicate it in external environment.
It's not the library's fault, I had few async race conditions which resulted in falsey spatial data on first iteration.

https://codesandbox.io/s/upbeat-lamarr-n3luuw?file=/src/index.js

I can eliminate the issue but this example still raises one question: if inserted item doesn't have valid spatial data, tree.remove will not remove them. Is this expected behaviour? I thought it's deleted by reference by I guess there's some spatial searching going on before we can actually compare the references?

Output will change if you change item spatial data from null to undefined.

[IvanSanchez]

if inserted item doesn't have valid spatial data, tree.remove will not remove them. Is this expected behaviour?

rbush assumes that the items have spatial data. If they don't, then that's a case of GIGO. IIRC, rbush needs spatial data to store an item in a rtree leaf and look for it through the branches.