[Bug]: Escalated appeals should have a better wording in version history
Opened this issue · 3 comments
ioanarusiczki commented
What happened?
From #2010 (comment)
- Report an extension or theme to go into Listings or Themes Cinder queues
- Resolve the report from Cinder
- Reporters or authors send an appeal
- Escalate to AMO the appeal from Cinder
- Go to rev tools Manual Review Queue and observe the version history on the add-on's review page
What did you expect to happen?
Maybe it should be "Escalated appeal via Cinder"
Is there an existing issue for this?
- I have searched the existing issues
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task
diox commented
Andreas, what's your opinion on this?
wagnerand commented
I agree that the entity that was escalated should be accurate. In this case an appeal was escalated, so the reviewer tools should say so accordingly.
This might be a separate issue, but we should also make sure that in this case all information about this report is shown to the reviewer, so they can understand and assess the appeal. This includes:
- the abuse report itself, including the category and additional details
- the decision of the moderator, including any details provided
- the appeal details provided by the reporter
It's unclear from the screenshot if that information is already shown somewhere.
ioanarusiczki commented
This is the details as available now:
