[BUG] .bashrc documentation incorrect.
Closed this issue · 3 comments
Describe the bug
The bash customization documents say to create a file that is not sourced by any of the scripts as it state.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Go to https://github.com/mylinuxforwork/dotfiles/wiki/Customize-the-.bashrc
- See the documentation still says to create a bashrc file that doesn't appear the included
.bashrc
will run. I appears the latest.bashrc
files will instead use the~/.config/bashrc/
and~/.config/bashrc/custom
folders to look for bash configuration.
Expected behavior
Not sure. I'm not certain if what the docs say or what the latest .bashrc
files do, are the intended way of accomplishing this.
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Distribution (please complete the following information):
- EndeavourOS
Additional context
Note I'd like to use stow to manage my .bashrc
(or soon to be .zshrc
) files but, I don't know if it works with the ~/.config/bashrc/
way of doing things or at least I could not get it to work. I think the way the linked documentation says to do it might be compatible with that.
If I may add, (I have at least 6 machines running arch + various versions of ml4w) on one of my machines, the .bashrc file itself sources .bashrc_custom if it exists. The .bashrc file even notes in a comment up top to create a .bashrc_custom file if any customizations are needed. But on another version of ml4w, the .bashrc file comment up top says to add files to ~/.config/bashrc, but a symbolic link already exists at that location with that name, so it is impossible to create any custom config file there. It further suggests one could create the ~/.config/zshrc/custom directory, and place customizations there, but ~/.config/zshrc is already there as a symlink to ../dotfiles/.config/zshrc, thus making that a bad choice as well. Please, please go back to having the .bashrc file look for and source any user-created ~/.bashrc_custom. That is the easiest way and cleanest (in my humble opinion).
In short, there is no easy way to really go about customizations in these recent versions of ml4w.
If I may add, (I have at least 6 machines running arch + various versions of ml4w) on one of my machines, the .bashrc file itself sources .bashrc_custom if it exists. The .bashrc file even notes in a comment up top to create a .bashrc_custom file if any customizations are needed. But on another version of ml4w, the .bashrc file comment up top says to add files to ~/.config/bashrc, but a symbolic link already exists at that location with that name, so it is impossible to create any custom config file there. It further suggests one could create the ~/.config/zshrc/custom directory, and place customizations there, but ~/.config/zshrc is already there as a symlink to ../dotfiles/.config/zshrc, thus making that a bad choice as well. Please, please go back to having the .bashrc file look for and source any user-created ~/.bashrc_custom. That is the easiest way and cleanest (in my humble opinion).
In short, there is no easy way to really go about customizations in these recent versions of ml4w.
Thanks for your feedback. I will look into it.
@rlovell3 Just pushed an update to bring back the .zshrc_custom and .bashrc_custom support.