Package doesn't have an explicit license file

[jordandobson]

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

Looking to get approval for usage and while the package.json says the package is under MIT license it would help the approval process if the package also listed that explicitly.

• https://docs.github.com/en/communities/setting-up-your-project-for-healthy-contributions/adding-a-license-to-a-repository

Expected Behavior

No response

Steps To Reproduce

No response

Versions

N/A

Screenshots

No response

Reproduction

Visit the github page and see the license not indicated :)

[nandorojo]

Thanks for the heads up! I'll get one added.

[nandorojo]

License added.