nanoexpress/pro-slim

Implement drop-in replacement of Express.js with 6-x performance difference?

dalisoft opened this issue · 5 comments

dalisoft commented

Hi users & stargazers!

I'd love to hear your ideas and agreements.
Also, for this feature (drop-in replacement), i am need two or three developer with free time and/or support for development hours (contact me for more information at dalisoft@mail.ru).

I am think this idea like nanoexpress Pro which is differs by performance, features and support.
If you like that, please leave "Emoji 👍".

Below you can see at which cost what you can get

Simple

  • Free
  • 4-5x faster than Express (not in all-cases)
  • 2-3x faster than Express (for Async routes)
  • Validation/Serialization out-of-the-box
  • Express.Static-like method
  • Auto Swagger/OpenAPI documentation
  • Latest Dependencies
  • Apache Licensed

Pro

  • Starting from 25$/month per user (only npm accessing) or 50$/month (access to project private repo)
  • 6-7x faster than Express (in most-cases)
  • 4-5x faster than Express (for Async routes)
  • Lighter size
  • More polyfilled methods
  • Express.Route polyfill
  • Express.Static polyfill
  • Less bugs and errors
  • Much Stable Performance / RPS
  • Auto Swagger/OpenAPI documentation
  • Bug-Fixes within 4-8 hours (if you paid for Pro)
  • Latest dependencies
  • Commercial license (license will be valid until you stop paying) for closed-source project per person, ONE person can use this if purchased, other can't if other not purchased.

Note: If you not agree, i will continue support this project.
Thank you.
I hope you understand me.

Update 1: You can try PRO in your open-source application
Update 2: Changing plans
Update 3: Update
Update 4: Change Commercial license term and remove support hour (who applied already until 19 August 2019 18:50:00 GMT+5, support hours will be applied for your purchased period of license)
Update 5: Typo fix
Update 6: Update
Update 7: Price improvement
Update 8: Price was changed, see my Patreon page

dalisoft commented

Ow, i see, you're don't want premium versions.
I'll close this issue and keep support current version

aprilcoskun commented

This library still in Alpha. I think it's too early to talking about paid versions.

dalisoft commented

@aprilcoskun You may be right, but i don't see any reason to don't make this way. I keep this project in Alpha, because there may be some bugs (tested, but not fully).
I want create 4 type of product which (2 of them already done at 50-60% locally).

Thanks for tip!

dalisoft commented

@aprilcoskun Can you try PRO and leave feedback?

dalisoft commented

This issue will be closed as i'll refered here