Literals + reflection - could this library be useful for value level expression generation?
paluh opened this issue · 3 comments
I want to ask you about opinion because I'm not capable to answer it definitively myself (so it is quite probable that this is just stupid question ;-))
Let's assume that we have a layer of literals + some form of reflection for them (a very limited stub and discussion).
Let's say that I want to generate typelevel expression which evaluates to a literal with record of lenses literals for a given record and then I reflect it.
I think that we would not be able to use a generated value like this easily as a type for the reflected record won't be "known" and fields won't be easily accessible because of this: purescript/purescript#3242
Do you think that it is feasible? Do you think that there is a way to overcome somehow limitation from the issue linked above? Do you think that this approach can be useful and it is worth further exploration?
Or maybe if I "accumulate" constraints like Row.Cons
I will be able to access these lenses at the end by using Record.get
... I'm not sure.
It seems that it is feasible. Sorry for the spam ;-)
P.S.
I was able to build a working really ugly prototype for lenses generation thanks to your lib + purescript-literal + reflection:
https://github.com/paluh/purescript-literal/blob/master/test/Main.purs#L79