Support for STEP in FOR ... NEXT
Closed this issue · 2 comments
oliverhermanni commented
That would be nice.
neilsf commented
Yeah I also think it should be supported for better BASIC compatibility. However, expect significant performance loss when looping with FOR with a STEP other than 1. Anyway, FOR is already pretty slow compared to REPEAT ... UNTIL.
Scheduled for v2.3
neilsf commented
Done in the upcoming v2.3