packspec vs specification_version
gwww opened this issue · 2 comments
The field descriptions use packspec
as the keyword in the schema. The examples use specification_version
.
My 2 cents is I dislike specification_version
as not being intent specific enough. I prefer packspec
but would prefer something even more descriptive. packspec_schema_version
is one suggestion.
packspec_version
?
My 2 cents is I dislike
specification_version
as not being intent specific enough. I preferpackspec
but would prefer something even more descriptive.
Examples were not updated, the schema is actually correct here, it supposed to be just packspec
.
I personally like just packspec
more. On top of declaring the actual specification version, the presence of the field itself can serve the purpose of "magic bytes", signifying that this is supposed to be a packspec file.