Add the ability to assign route-map to a BGP neighbor in address-family (non-VRF and VRF)
Closed this issue · 1 comments
mobig commented
Hello,
Reviewing the restconf of my lab C8000v, there seems to be no restconf path for applying a route-map to a bgp neighbor outside an address-family. Like so:
!
router bgp 65000
neighbor 192.168.0.152 remote-as 65000
neighbor 192.168.0.152 description Site-04_01
neighbor 192.168.0.152 route-map RM2 in
!
This may be by design by Cisco as most people use address-families these days. Like so:
!
router bgp 65000
neighbor 192.168.0.153 remote-as 65000
neighbor 192.168.0.153 description Site-04_02
!
address-family ipv4
neighbor 192.168.0.153 activate
neighbor 192.168.0.153 route-map RM1 in
exit-address-family
!
It appears the way the resource is structured today is that you must specify a VRF if using iosxe_bgp_ipv4_unicast_vrf_neighbor
. There should probably be a change to the resource to add the option of "no-vrf" for BGP neighbors that are a part of the address-family but not in a VRF (like my 2nd example above). This is what the RESTCONF looks like for the 2nd example:
"router": {
"Cisco-IOS-XE-bgp:bgp": [
{
"id": 65000,
"bgp": {
"log-neighbor-changes": true
},
"neighbor": [
{
"id": "192.168.0.152",
"remote-as": 65000,
"description": "Site-04_01"
}
],
"address-family": {
"with-vrf": {
"ipv4": [
{
"af-name": "unicast"
}
]
},
"no-vrf": {
"ipv4": [
{
"af-name": "unicast",
"ipv4-unicast": {
"neighbor": [
{
"id": "192.168.0.152",
"activate": [null],
"route-map": [
{
"inout": "in",
"route-map-name": "RM1"
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
}
]
}
danischm commented
I have published v0.1.15 with a few new BGP resources to support this.