Pug 2 support
Closed this issue · 3 comments
jirikaiser-atypon commented
Does the latest version (1.2.6) support Pug 2?
adrogon commented
I have always used mixins with +
symbols instead of mixin
, and each
statements without the -
prefix.
So I guess the answer is yes.
chbloemer commented
It supports the latest jade version. It is not tested against pug 2. If the syntax didn't change a lot from jade to pug, it may support it. We changed jade4j in the latest version to support different file extensions. So you can use pug file extension.
chbloemer commented
Done. See https://github.com/neuland/pug4j