[BUG] Wrong Comment types in RO-Crate export of LabProcess and Publication.

[floWetzels]

In the RO-Crate export, comments attached to ISA types should either be mapped to

• the field comment of type Comment, if the ISA type maps to a schema.org type inheriting from CreativeWork, or
• to the field disambiguatingDescription of type Text, if the ISA type maps to a schema.org type not inheriting from CreativeWork.

Two types contradict this convention: Publication and Process.

• Publication is mapped to ScholarlyArticle which has a comment field, but the current export uses the encoder to disambiguatingDescription, as does the corresponding context file.
• Process is mapped to LabProcess which doesn't have a comment field, but the current export uses the encoder to Comment, contradicting its context file.

[HLWeil]

Good catch!

Could you annotate this issue in the ARCStack project, assign yourself if you're going to work on it and remote the Status: Needs Triage tag?