change name `mapping` to `model` or `cube`
Closed this issue · 3 comments
pwalsh commented
Probably model
: I believe it is much closer to what we now have than mapping
.
Raised in #93 (comment)
Also https://github.com/dataprotocols/dataprotocols/issues/238
pudo commented
+1
danfowler commented
I'm generally in favor of this as "mapping" is probably insufficient for describing what is happening in the mapping
object. Beyond mapping physical ("source") columns to logical columns, the object describes how they relate to each other ("measures" v.s. "dimensions"). The fact that this object also gives fiscal types to dimensions makes me prefer the more generic model
over cube
.
rufuspollock commented
AGREED. Rename mapping
to model
.