openssl/technical-policies

Vote: Backport PR #19681 to 3.0 as a bug fix

romen opened this issue · 13 comments

romen commented 
Topic: Backport PR #19681 to 3.0 as a bug fix
Comment: Fundamentally OTC must decide if in the 3.0 release we should
         honor OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_EC_POINT_CONVERSION_FORMAT as set (and
         default to UNCOMPRESSED) in our provider implementations, and
         apply corresponding changes for handling legacy keys.
Proposed by: Nicola Tuveri
Issue link: https://github.com/openssl/technical-policies/issues/60
Public: yes
Opened: 2022-12-01
Closed: 2022-12-14
Accepted:  yes  (for: 4, against: 0, abstained: 5, not voted: 2)

  Dmitry     [+1]
  Matt       [ 0]
  Pauli      [+1]
  Tim        [ 0]
  Hugo       [+0]
  Richard    [  ]
  Shane      [ 0]
  Tomas      [ 0]
  Kurt       [  ]
  Matthias   [+1]
  Nicola     [+1]

Convenience links

romen commented

For now this is still to be considered as a draft, and I haven't advertised it on the openssl-project ML.

@openssl/otc do you have feedback for the vote text before I formally open this vote?

paulidale commented

I'm fine with the vote text.

romen commented

Opening the vote now

paulidale commented

vote: +1

t-j-h commented

Vote: [0]

slontis commented

Vote: [0]

hlandau commented

Vote: [+0]

mattcaswell commented

Vote: [0]

t8m commented

Vote: [0]

Unless there will be some minus votes, this will be probably a record passed vote in terms of the number of abstentions. 😁

beldmit commented

vote: +1

mspncp commented

Vote: [+1]

romen commented

Closing the vote now as accepted:

Topic: Backport PR #19681 to 3.0 as a bug fix
Comment: Fundamentally OTC must decide if in the 3.0 release we should
         honor OSSL_PKEY_PARAM_EC_POINT_CONVERSION_FORMAT as set (and
         default to UNCOMPRESSED) in our provider implementations, and
         apply corresponding changes for handling legacy keys.
Proposed by: Nicola Tuveri
Issue link: https://github.com/openssl/technical-policies/issues/60
Public: yes
Opened: 2022-12-01
Closed: 2022-12-14
Accepted:  yes  (for: 4, against: 0, abstained: 5, not voted: 2)

  Dmitry     [+1]
  Matt       [ 0]
  Pauli      [+1]
  Tim        [ 0]
  Hugo       [+0]
  Richard    [  ]
  Shane      [ 0]
  Tomas      [ 0]
  Kurt       [  ]
  Matthias   [+1]
  Nicola     [+1]
romen commented

See openssl/openssl#19901 for the 3.0-backport PR.