Same as before ordinal-mini-doges not correct on website

[minidogenft]

Hello guys, same old issue still not fixed.

ordinal-mini-doges is not correct on website. it seems the inscriptions.json was automatically rebuilt 3 months ago.
as mentioned as previously raised issues, we updated ordinal-mini-doges because 15 ordinals were transferred to the second collection pixel-doges.

I see now that you have listed our second collection pixel-doges which is good.
But the 15 ordinals that we wanted to remove from ordinals-mini-doges are now duplicated and existing in both collection.

Please help, all whats left to do is to remove the 15 from ordinal-mini-doges and its all good :

this is their inscription ids, they should only exist in pixel-doges collection, not ordinal-mini-doges collection.

c165a359a7ee43417156839d6f67d8c2552b6c8fadb6b20136375a900bcf4a28i0
2c3f52510b540333eeeac1c52e4bc100a3c04828b1983b6533318df969779639i0
e5922f7d2315d3ed2be3719c504314aa6a0cd21afeaca48443dfa39a29497a45i0
47fe89800be9445970579582dac2c59b064b819b07f7a20fda2fe7d410d3ff7fi0
4a25149cd270f1a600ca43aa13d98913d549bd31a1de515874db047dfed30985i0
966e3040c523890be6ee1532793b10e907b8b05877a55886f1260fa852afcfb1i0
2b18270a705e0ea449439a91763d374a88115f50630ae4dfdfe53b3767312ecai0
34ae08ab644fcccbab70f239e04fa023b94effcfbc8674d17f598a6759e90a1ci0
9720c2db0adbfdb87df9b8988af4b4517fe41cc51b3715dc365d36caab170448i0
dac39159be93067416ed3f1bf35f66f74d9fc802c73e91bc30c876ef0475b073i0
b5749d747e8f48545ece82c0b431266faffbc0cf6dc79687e178833784a17d84i0
6943b3328d77146df4c818ae411ec6c32160fa255f729201fb5deaa6718ec8dbi0
423e2f9dc7e517ec07a51ea02c6d6031980fd9e80c851e1c1b10cae70e8f5fe8i0
17f20a69b3f0a53bd087ef8de0c308c7abd9eb7774847fa04f3b094672af4ebfi0
8b7f88d9a726da3c1336f009c61272a54318e52637b9c3ded9c5549d93e6b3bfi0

Please help as it has been so many month we have tried to seek help here.
thank you !

[minidogenft]

Guys we also own "Doginal Mini Doges" inscription 14578-24913. We will launch soon, but it would be great to fix the issue above first. I would gladly submit another PR to once again fix the inscriptions.json, but as stated in our previous raised issues (now closed without fix), the website was not reflecting the changes. Please, help.