"Relative size" calculation disagrees with paper
ISSOtm opened this issue · 0 comments
ISSOtm commented
The paper states that the relative size of a tile on a page is ∑[s∈t] (1 ∕ µ_p(s))
, but the Python code instead does ∑[s∈t] (1 ∕ (1 + µ_p(s)))
, which seems more reasonable given that it doesn't divide by 0 if a symbol is nowhere to be found in the page.
pagination/code/solver_tools.py
Line 66 in 7a43308
Nevertheless, the two disagree!