parro-it/awesome-micro-npm-packages

minor re-organization to alphabetical order?

jonschlinkert opened this issue ยท 8 comments

Would you be opposed to re-organizing the sections and lists by alphabetical order? As the list grows it will be easier to scan for information.

I'd be happy to do a PR

Would you be opposed to re-organizing the sections and lists by alphabetical order? As the list grows it will be easier to scan for information.

Not at all, I think it could be useful.

I'd be happy to do a PR

๐Ÿพ that's great! thank you...

How about a TOC?

Oh yes, good idea too... Will you use some tool for this?
I guess you wrote some good one ๐Ÿ˜„

Lol, I was going to do it by hand. But we can use markdown-toc if you want.

The command would be:

$ markdown-toc readme.md

and that would just update the TOC. Any preference?

Great, one more question... How about some new sections, for buffer, error, regular expressions, and other native types that are missing? Or we can just keep it as-is for now.

edit: then we can rename that section to "JavaScript Native Types" or something. thoughts?

edit 2: should I sort "Small modules rockstars to follow" by first name, last name, or GitHub username?

buffer, error, regular expressions

That's ok

other native types

There's already a "string" and a "math" section (for numbers). There's still Boolean, I would prefer a "Logic section" only for that...

Or did I misunderstand what you mean by "native types"?

By the way, I'm also thinking of adding a "Collections" section containing
modules developed around the same theme.

It will, by now, contains https://github.com/sindresorhus/promise-fun by Sindre Sorhus and https://github.com/parro-it/ai-fun by me (not completed yet, inspired by the former).

Do you think it could be a useful section?

Or did I misunderstand what you mean by "native types"?

Maybe, I just meant all of the native javascript types (primitives and object types. for example, Number is a primitive, Math is a global object for mathematical operations). But to your point, maybe there is little use for a number section if math isn't involved.

For now I'll just do the TOC and sorting, and we can go from there.

Do you think it could be a useful section?

Hmm, might be beyond the scope of this lib IMHO.