pika: A C++ repository from peter5232

Stargazers Over Time	Contributors Over Time

Introduction中文

Pika is a high-performance, large-capacity, multi-tenant, data-persistent elastic KV data storage system using RocksDB as the storage engine. It is fully compatible with the Redis protocol and supports its commonly used data structures, such as string/hash/list/zset/set/geo/hyperloglog/pubsub/bitmap/stream, etc. Redis Interface.

When Redis's in-memory usage exceeds 16GiB, it faces problems such as limited memory capacity, single-threaded blocking, long startup recovery time, high memory hardware costs, easily filled buffers, and high switching costs when one master and multiple replicas fail. The emergence of Pika is not to replace Redis but to complement it. Pika strives to completely comply with the Redis protocol, inherit Redis's convenient operation and maintenance design, and solve the bottleneck problem of Redis running out of memory capacity once the data volume becomes huge by using persistent storage. Additionally, Pika can support master-slave mode using the slaveof command, and it also supports full and incremental data synchronization.

Pika can be deployed in a single-machine master-slave mode (slaveof) or in a Codis cluster mode, allowing for simple scaling and shrinking. Migration from Redis to Pika can be smoothly executed by tools.

Pika Features

Protocol Compatibility: Fully compatible with the Redis protocol, emphasizing high performance, large capacity, low cost, and scalability.
Data Structures: Supports Redis's common data structures, including String, Hash, List, Zset, Set, Geo, Hyperloglog, Pubsub, Bitmap, Stream, ACL, etc.
Cold and Hot Data: Caches hot data and persistently stores the full data in RocksDB, implementing a hierarchical storage of cold and hot data.
High Capacity: Compared to Redis's in-memory storage, Pika supports data volumes in the hundreds of gigabytes, significantly reducing server resource consumption and enhancing data reliability.
Deployment Modes: Supports single-machine master-slave mode (slaveof) and Codis cluster mode, making scaling and shrinking simple.
Easy Migration: Smooth migration from Redis to Pika without modifying code.
Convenient Operation and Maintenance: Comprehensive operation and maintenance command documentation.

Pika Storage Engine Architecture

Supports multiple platforms: CentOS, Ubuntu, macOS
Multi-threaded model
Based on the RocksDB storage engine
Multiple granularity data caching model

Deployment Modes

1. Master-Slave Mode

Architecture similar to Redis
Good compatibility with Redis protocol and data structures
Each data structure uses a separate RocksDB instance
Master-slave adopts binlog asynchronous replication

2. Distributed Cluster Mode

Adopts Codis architecture, supports multiple groups
Each group forms a master-slave set
Elastic scaling based on groups

Pika User Showcase

Pika has been widely adopted by various companies for internal deployments, demonstrating its scalability and reliability. Some notable usage instances include:

360 Company: Internal deployment with a scale of 10,000+ instances, each having a data volume of 1.8TB.
Weibo: Internal deployment with 10,000+ instances.
Ximalaya(Xcache): 6,000+ instances with a massive data volume exceeding 120TB.
Getui (个推) Company: Internal deployment involving 300+ instances, with a cumulative data volume surpassing 30TB.

Additionally, Pika is utilized by companies such as Xunlei, Xiaomi, Zhihu, New Oriental Education & Technology Group (好未来), Kuaishou, Sohu, Meituan, Maimai, and more. For a comprehensive list of users, you can refer to the official list provided by the Pika project.

These deployments across a diverse range of companies and industries underscore Pika's adaptability and effectiveness in handling large-scale, high-volume data storage requirements.

1. Binary Package Installation

Users can directly download the latest binary version package from releases.

2. Compilation from Source

2.1 Supported Platforms
- Linux - CentOS
- Linux - Ubuntu
- macOS(Darwin)
2.2 Required Library Software
- gcc g++ supporting C++17 (version >= 9)
- make
- cmake (version >= 3.18)
- autoconf
- tar
2.3 Compilation Process
- 2.3.1. Get the source code
```
  git clone https://github.com/OpenAtomFoundation/pika.git
```
- 2.3.2. Switch to the latest release version
```
  git tag          # Check the latest release tag (e.g., v3.4.1)
  git checkout TAG # Switch to the latest version (e.g., git checkout v3.4.1)
```
- 2.3.3. Execute compilation
  If the machine's gcc version is less than 9, especially on CentOS6 or CentOS7, you need to upgrade the gcc version first. Execute the following commands:
```
  sudo yum -y install centos-release-scl
  sudo yum -y install devtoolset-9-gcc devtoolset-9-gcc-c++
  scl enable devtoolset-9 bash
```
  For the initial compilation, it is recommended to use the build script build.sh, which checks if the required software is available on the local machine.
```
  ./build.sh
```
  Note: The compiled files will be saved in the output directory.
  
  Pika is compiled by default in release mode, which does not support debugging. If debugging is needed, compile in debug mode.
```
  rm -rf output/
  cmake -B output -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
  cd output && make
```
  Other components, such as codis and pika_operator, can also be compiled using build.sh.
```
  # Compile codis, default target, build-all
  ./build.sh codis

  # Compile codis, but only build codis-proxy
  ./build.sh codis codis-proxy

  # Compile pika_operator
  ./build.sh operator
```
2.4 Start Pika
```
  ./output/pika -c ./conf/pika.conf
```
2.5 Clear Compiled Results

If you need to clear the compilation content, you can choose one of the following methods based on the situation:

Method 1: Clean only the current compilation content
```
  cd output && make clean
```
Method 2: Completely recompile
```
  rm -rf output # regenerate cmake
```
2.6 Pika Development Debugging

Setting up Pika Development Environment with CLion

3. Containerization

3.1 Running with Docker

docker run -d \
  --restart=always \
  -p 9221:9221 \
  -v <log_dir>:/pika/log \
  -v <db_dir>:/pika/db \
  -v <dump_dir>:/pika/dump \
  -v <dbsync_dir>:/pika/dbsync \
  pikadb/pika:v3.3.6

redis-cli -p 9221 "info"

3.2 Build Custom Image

If you want to build your own image, we provide a script build_docker.sh to simplify the process.

This script accepts several optional parameters:
- -t tag: Specify the Docker tag for the image. By default, the tag is pikadb/pika:.
- -p platform: Specify the platform for the Docker image. Options include all, linux/amd64, linux/arm, linux/arm64. By default, it uses the current docker platform setting.
- --proxy: Use a proxy to download packages to speed up the build process. The build will use Alibaba Cloud's image source.
- --help: Display help information.
Here is an example usage:
```
./build_docker.sh -p linux/amd64 -t private_registry/pika:latest
```

3.3 Deployment with Pika-operator

Using pika-operator simplifies the deployment of a single-instance pika in a Kubernetes environment.

Note: Do not use this feature in a production environment.

Local installation:

Install MiniKube
Deploy Pika-operator

cd tools/pika_operator
make minikube-up # run this if you don't have a minikube cluster
make local-deploy

Create a Pika instance

cd tools/pika_operator
kubectl apply -f examples/pika-sample/

Check the Pika status

  kubectl get pika pika-sample

Get Pika instance information

kubectl run pika-sample-test \
  --image redis -it --rm --restart=Never \
  -- /usr/local/bin/redis-cli -h pika-sample -p 9221 info

Performance test

Thanks deep011 for providing performance test results.

Note: The test results were obtained under specific conditions and scenarios, and may not represent the performance in all environments and scenarios. They are for reference only.

We recommend that you conduct detailed testing of Pika in your own environment based on the usage scenario to assess whether Pika meets your requirements.

1. Test environment

CPU Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz
CPU Threads: 56
Memory: 256GB
Disk: 3TB Flash
Network: 10GBase-T/Full * 2
Operating System: CentOS 6.6
Pika Version: 2.2.4

2. Benchmarking Tool

vire-benchmark

3. Test Cases

3.1 Case 1

Test Objective

Evaluate the upper limit of QPS for Pika under different worker thread counts.

Test Conditions
- Pika Data Size: 800GB
- Value: 128 bytes
- CPU not bound
Test Results

Note： The x-axis represents Pika thread count, and the y-axis represents QPS with a value size of 128 bytes. "set3/get7" indicates 30% set and 70% get operations.
Case One Conclusion

From the above graph, it can be observed that setting Pika's worker thread count to 20-24 is more cost-effective.

3.2 Case 2

Test Objective

Evaluate the RTT performance of Pika with the optimal worker thread count (20 threads).
Test Conditions
- Pika Data Size: 800GB
- Value: 128 bytes

Test Results

====== GET ======
  10000000 requests completed in 23.10 seconds
  200 parallel clients
  3 bytes payload
  keep alive: 1
99.89% <= 1 milliseconds
100.00% <= 2 milliseconds
100.00% <= 3 milliseconds
100.00% <= 5 milliseconds
100.00% <= 6 milliseconds
100.00% <= 7 milliseconds
100.00% <= 7 milliseconds
432862.97 requests per second

====== SET ======
  10000000 requests completed in 36.15 seconds
  200 parallel clients
  3 bytes payload
  keep alive: 1
91.97% <= 1 milliseconds
99.98% <= 2 milliseconds
99.98% <= 3 milliseconds
99.98% <= 4 milliseconds
99.98% <= 5 milliseconds
99.98% <= 6 milliseconds
99.98% <= 7 milliseconds
99.98% <= 9 milliseconds
99.98% <= 10 milliseconds
99.98% <= 11 milliseconds
99.98% <= 12 milliseconds
99.98% <= 13 milliseconds
99.98% <= 16 milliseconds
99.98% <= 18 milliseconds
99.99% <= 19 milliseconds
99.99% <= 23 milliseconds
99.99% <= 24 milliseconds
99.99% <= 25 milliseconds
99.99% <= 27 milliseconds
99.99% <= 28 milliseconds
99.99% <= 34 milliseconds
99.99% <= 37 milliseconds
99.99% <= 39 milliseconds
99.99% <= 40 milliseconds
99.99% <= 46 milliseconds
99.99% <= 48 milliseconds
99.99% <= 49 milliseconds
99.99% <= 50 milliseconds
99.99% <= 51 milliseconds
99.99% <= 52 milliseconds
99.99% <= 61 milliseconds
99.99% <= 63 milliseconds
99.99% <= 72 milliseconds
99.99% <= 73 milliseconds
99.99% <= 74 milliseconds
99.99% <= 76 milliseconds
99.99% <= 83 milliseconds
99.99% <= 84 milliseconds
99.99% <= 88 milliseconds
99.99% <= 89 milliseconds
99.99% <= 133 milliseconds
99.99% <= 134 milliseconds
99.99% <= 146 milliseconds
99.99% <= 147 milliseconds
100.00% <= 203 milliseconds
100.00% <= 204 milliseconds
100.00% <= 208 milliseconds
100.00% <= 217 milliseconds
100.00% <= 218 milliseconds
100.00% <= 219 milliseconds
100.00% <= 220 milliseconds
100.00% <= 229 milliseconds
100.00% <= 229 milliseconds
276617.50 requests per second

Case 2 Conclusion

The response time for 99.9% of get/set operations is within 2ms.

3.3 Case 3

Test Objective

Evaluate the maximum QPS for each command in Pika with the optimal worker thread count.
Test Conditions
- Pika Worker Thread Count: 20
- Number of Keys: 10,000
- Number of Fields: 100 (excluding lists)
- Value: 128 bytes
- Number of Command Executions: 10 million (except for lrange)

Test Results

PING_INLINE: 548606.50 requests per second
PING_BULK: 544573.31 requests per second
SET: 231830.31 requests per second
GET: 512163.91 requests per second
INCR: 230861.56 requests per second
MSET (10 keys): 94991.12 requests per second
LPUSH: 196093.81 requests per second
RPUSH: 195186.69 requests per second
LPOP: 131156.14 requests per second
RPOP: 152292.77 requests per second
LPUSH (needed to benchmark LRANGE): 196734.20 requests per second
LRANGE_10 (first 10 elements): 334448.16 requests per second
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements): 50705.12 requests per second
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements): 16745.16 requests per second
LRANGE_450 (first 450 elements): 6787.94 requests per second
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements): 3170.38 requests per second
SADD: 160885.52 requests per second
SPOP: 128920.80 requests per second
HSET: 180209.41 requests per second
HINCRBY: 153364.81 requests per second
HINCRBYFLOAT: 141095.47 requests per second
HGET: 506791.00 requests per second
HMSET (10 fields): 27777.31 requests per second
HMGET (10 fields): 38998.52 requests per second
HGETALL: 109059.58 requests per second
ZADD: 120583.62 requests per second
ZREM: 161689.33 requests per second
PFADD: 6153.47 requests per second
PFCOUNT: 28312.57 requests per second
PFADD (needed to benchmark PFMERGE): 6166.37 requests per second
PFMERGE: 6007.09 requests per second

Conclusion

Overall performance is excellent, but some commands exhibit weaker performance (LRANGE, PFADD, PFMERGE).

3.4 Case 4

Test Objective

Compare the maximum QPS between Pika and Redis.
Test Conditions
- Pika Worker Thread Count: 20
- Number of Keys: 10,000
- Number of Fields: 100 (excluding lists)
- Value: 128 bytes
- Number of Command Executions: 10 million (except for LRANGE)
- Redis Version: 3.2.0
Test Result

Observability

Metrics

Pika Server Info: system, ip, port, run_id, config file etc.
Pika Data Info: db size, log size, memory usage etc.
Pika Client Info: The number of connected clients.
Pika Stats Info: status information of compact, slot, etc.
Pika Network Info: Incoming and outgoing traffic and rate of client and master-slave replication.
Pika CPU Info: cpu usage.
Pika Replication Info: Status information of master-slave replication, binlog information.
Pika Keyspace Info: key information of five data types.
Pika Command Exec Count Info: command execution count.
Pika Command Execution Time: Time-consuming command execution.
RocksDB Metrics: RocksDB information of five data types, includes Memtable, Block Cache, Compaction, SST File, Blob File etc.

More details on Metrics.

Documents

wiki
release notes

Contact Us

Slack Channel

peter5232/pika

Introduction中文

Pika Features

Pika Storage Engine Architecture

Deployment Modes

1. Master-Slave Mode

2. Distributed Cluster Mode

Pika User Showcase

Getting Started with Pika

1. Binary Package Installation

2. Compilation from Source

2.1 Supported Platforms

2.2 Required Library Software

2.3 Compilation Process

2.4 Start Pika

2.5 Clear Compiled Results

2.6 Pika Development Debugging

3. Containerization

3.1 Running with Docker

3.2 Build Custom Image

3.3 Deployment with Pika-operator

Performance test

1. Test environment

2. Benchmarking Tool

3. Test Cases

3.1 Case 1

Test Objective

Test Conditions

Test Results

Case One Conclusion

3.2 Case 2

Test Objective

Test Conditions

Test Results

Case 2 Conclusion

3.3 Case 3

Test Objective

Test Conditions

Test Results

Conclusion

3.4 Case 4

Test Objective

Test Conditions

Test Result

Observability

Metrics

Documents

Contact Us