Re-visit [example] and [code] attribute logic

[philosowaffle]

Should be possible to remove the nested -[code] attribute, and simply state +[code] as a primary attribute. We should also consider keeping +[example] as a reserved word that processes a block the same way as [code], that way an example can be multi-lined.

[philosowaffle]

New thoughts:

Every attribute should support multi-line content.

+[title]: myTitle
+[description]: {
                   multi-line content goes here
                   if docme does not find a nested -[attribute] then it considers
                    it multi-line content
 }
 +[input]: {
            -[subAttribute]: regular, single-line nested attribute
            -[varName]: var description
            -[idea]: we should remove the '->' syntax and just make the subAttribute be the var name
 }
 +[code]: {
                  code remains a reserved word since code will be formatted differently
                   than plain text, however it should be parse the same as plain text, it will
                   only be different in the output
  }

This will allow us to limit the number of reserved words, keep a cleaner syntax, and provide more flexibility for the user.

[philosowaffle]

wiki