b and i are not purely visual
Opened this issue · 0 comments
The <b>
, <i>
vs <strong>
, <em>
page writes that b
and i
are purely visual, however, I think that is misleading.
As far as I know, these tags were repurposed in the HTML 5 specification in order to get away from the stylistic—or in other words visual—definition of those tags while also providing reasonable backwards compatibility. According to the standards, the i
element:
[…]represents a span of text in an alternate voice or mood[…]
[…]represents a span of text to which attention is being drawn for utilitarian purposes without conveying any extra importance and with no implication of an alternate voice or mood[…]
Whether those definitions imply extra semantic meaning or not is a good question. In my understanding they do. But I'm fairly certain that they make b
and i
more than purely visual.