Why we need the HR reconstruction loss?
hui-po-wang opened this issue · 2 comments
Dear authors,
I appreciate your novel work, that's really impressive.
I was wondering why you need the reconstruction loss in the case the invertible net is able to recover the HR images. I am also curious if you have any ablation study on this loss, which can better shows the contribution of it.
Thanks for your time.
As said in 'HR Reconstruction' part in the paper, although f_{\theta} is invertible, we do not store the forward-generated z and we use a random sample from p(z) to replace it when upscaling, so it is not for the correspondence between x and y. Therefore HR Reconstruction loss is needed to enable the model to restore HR images with any sample from p(z), which also inversely encourages the forward process to produce a disentangled representation of z from y.
Thanks for the reply, and I think the reason of this design is that we only have low resolution images at the testing time.