Client update needed to match REST spec changes
client-library-maintainer opened this issue · 1 comments
client-library-maintainer commented
A diff between this client library's spec and our hosted spec was found. The client may need an update to match any changes in our API. See the diff below:
--- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/polygon-io/client-python/master/.polygon/rest.json
+++ https://api.polygon.io/openapi
@@ -25536,7 +25536,7 @@
"operationId": "ListStockSplits",
"parameters": [
{
- "description": "Return the stock splits that contain this ticker.",
+ "description": "Specify a case-sensitive ticker symbol. For example, AAPL represents Apple Inc.",
"in": "query",
"name": "ticker",
"schema": {
@@ -25570,7 +25570,7 @@
}
},
{
- "description": "Search by ticker.",
+ "description": "Range by ticker.",
"in": "query",
"name": "ticker.gte",
"schema": {
@@ -25578,7 +25578,7 @@
}
},
{
- "description": "Search by ticker.",
+ "description": "Range by ticker.",
"in": "query",
"name": "ticker.gt",
"schema": {
@@ -25586,7 +25586,7 @@
}
},
{
- "description": "Search by ticker.",
+ "description": "Range by ticker.",
"in": "query",
"name": "ticker.lte",
"schema": {
@@ -25594,7 +25594,7 @@
}
},
{
- "description": "Search by ticker.",
+ "description": "Range by ticker.",
"in": "query",
"name": "ticker.lt",
"schema": {
@@ -25602,7 +25602,7 @@
}
},
{
- "description": "Search by execution_date.",
+ "description": "Range by execution_date.",
"in": "query",
"name": "execution_date.gte",
"schema": {
@@ -25611,7 +25611,7 @@
}
},
{
- "description": "Search by execution_date.",
+ "description": "Range by execution_date.",
"in": "query",
"name": "execution_date.gt",
"schema": {
@@ -25620,7 +25620,7 @@
}
},
{
- "description": "Search by execution_date.",
+ "description": "Range by execution_date.",
"in": "query",
"name": "execution_date.lte",
"schema": {
@@ -25629,7 +25629,7 @@
}
},
{
- "description": "Search by execution_date.",
+ "description": "Range by execution_date.",
"in": "query",
"name": "execution_date.lt",
"schema": {
justinpolygon commented
Dupe of #621