postrank-labs/goliath

1.0.5 release

Juanmcuello opened this issue · 14 comments

Hi, Is there any plan on releasing version 1.0.5?

We'd like to use this in production (again). Is there any movement here?

Apologies for holding up the train here.. :)

Yes, we can do a point release. That said, there are bunch of open pull requests and issues open -- any that we need to address / close out first? I'd appreciate someone jumping in to help / happy to add folks as collaborators.

It would be great to have a new release at least with the changes merged until now, as the last release was 3 years ago.

We can then continue reviewing open issues and pull requests.

Agreed, the lack of support here is becoming a subject on contention when considering EM vs other C10K solutions in Ruby, like Celluloid.

@dankozlowski @Juanmcuello apologies about the delays. I'm happy to push a new release, and even better, give commit and rubygems access to anyone interested in working on it. Either of you interested?

It looks like some specs are breaking due to outdated dependency.. I'd prefer to get that fixed before we push a new build?

@igrigorik , It would be great to give you and @dj2 a hand maintaining the project if you need it. Count on me.

Regarding the outdated dependencies, I created a PR (#330) that updates rspec, fixing the failed specs.

@Juanmcuello thanks for PR! Merged, still seeing some failures though.. left a comment on the PR.

Also, you should get an invite ... :)

@igrigorik I'd love to help out! 100% in. Also happy to help fix the build so we can get 1.5 out the door!

@dankozlowski awesome, check your invites! Thanks for jumping in.

I'm still struggling to figure out why current build is failing on my end.. but Travis is green. =|

Do you guys see any other issues or PRs we want to land before 1.0.5? If not, I can push new release on rubygems.

@igrigorik , I created another PR (#331) that removes a some warnings.

I was skimming issues/PRs and, although there are some issues related to config files that I personally would like to address, I think it would take some effort to analyze them properly, so probably master is good enough as it is for releasing 1.0.5.

Anyway, it would be better if you can figure out why your tests are failing in your local box before doing the release, just in case we have missed anything.

Thanks for #331!

I was skimming issues/PRs and, although there are some issues related to config files that I personally would like to address, I think it would take some effort to analyze them properly, so probably master is good enough as it is for releasing 1.0.5.

sgtm.

Anyway, it would be better if you can figure out why your tests are failing in your local box before doing the release, just in case we have missed anything.

Still puzzled over this. That said, it does look like it's something wonky in my environment.

Pushed 1.0.5 to rubygems. Please give it a try and reopen if you stumble across any issues.

Excelent @igrigorik! I'll give it a try. Thanks!

Woo! In testing now.