Extra lines on verbose output of `ANALYZE`
Closed this issue · 1 comments
versar commented
Issue occurs following this cell:
%%bql ANALYZE mml_bangladesh_allvars_allages FOR 2 MINUTE WAIT (OPTIMIZED)
Output of pip freeze
is
alabaster==0.7.9
Babel==2.3.4
backports-abc==0.5
backports.shutil-get-terminal-size==1.0.0
bayeslite==0.2.0a20161223.post7
bayeslite-apsw==3.9.2.post1
bdbcontrib==0.2.0a20161117.post1
bleach==1.5.0
certifi==2016.9.26
cgpm==0.1a20161223.post27
click==6.6
configparser==3.5.0
crosscat==0.1.56a20161117.post1
cycler==0.10.0
Cython==0.25.2
decorator==4.0.10
docutils==0.13.1
entrypoints==0.2.2
enum34==1.1.6
Flask==0.12
functools32==3.2.3.post2
html5lib==0.9999999
imagesize==0.7.1
ipykernel==4.5.2
ipython==5.1.0
ipython-genutils==0.1.0
ipywidgets==5.2.2
itsdangerous==0.24
iventure==0.1a20161223.post56
Jinja2==2.8.1
jsonschema==2.5.1
jupyter==1.0.0
jupyter-client==4.4.0
jupyter-console==5.0.0
jupyter-core==4.2.1
Markdown==2.6.7
MarkupSafe==0.23
matplotlib==1.5.3
mistune==0.7.3
nbconvert==5.0.0
nbformat==4.2.0
nbimporter==0.2
networkx==1.11
notebook==4.3.1
numpy==1.11.3
numpydoc==0.6.0
pandas==0.18.1
pandocfilters==1.4.1
pathlib2==2.2.0
patsy==0.4.1
pexpect==4.2.1
pickleshare==0.7.4
prompt-toolkit==1.0.9
ptyprocess==0.5.1
Pygments==2.1.3
pyparsing==2.1.10
python-dateutil==2.6.0
pytz==2016.10
pyzmq==16.0.2
qtconsole==4.2.1
requests==2.12.4
scandir==1.4
scikit-learn==0.18.1
scipy==0.18.1
seaborn==0.7.1
simplegeneric==0.8.1
singledispatch==3.4.0.3
six==1.10.0
sklearn==0.0
sklearn-pandas==1.2.0
snowballstemmer==1.2.1
Sphinx==1.5.1
statsmodels==0.6.1
terminado==0.6
testpath==0.3
tornado==4.4.2
traitlets==4.3.1
venture==0.5.1a20161223.post7
wcwidth==0.1.7
Werkzeug==0.11.13
widgetsnbextension==1.2.6
fsaad commented
The issue is with the version notebook==4.3.1
. Installing notebook==4.2.1
will ensure the issue goes away, as specified in the requirements.txt file for iventure:
https://github.com/probcomp/iventure/blob/master/requirements.txt
I'm not sure why the progress bar is not compatible with notebook 4.3.1
, but I do not think it is worth looking into. If you feel strongly about this, please re-file the ticket in iventure
(rather than bayeslite
).