Request for new Blog Posting: Buildah
Closed this issue · 10 comments
Hi Josh,
Please ready the google document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OcgQNF0uBUoe_DWauuAsoyDsa80Nj57AhmLpjOSYXT4
For posting to the ProjectAtomic blog. If you'd like, I'm happy to convert this from google docs to an md file. Please let me know if you need me to tweak/review anything.
Thanks!
@rhatdan @fatherlinux @nalind : FYI "Buildah - build your containers from the ground up!" is in the process of getting posted.
@TomSweeneyRedHat sweet!!! If you wouldn't mind, let me know the URL when it goes live. I will evangelize and track :-)
@fatherlinux Absolutely and advTHANKSance!
Shedule: I will post a PR with this blog post late this afternoon (Pacific time) for @TomSweeneyRedHat to review. If he can review it in the morning, I can post it early in the day tommorrow.
@TomSweeneyRedHat I'm seeing one major issue with the blog post: it doesn't explain why not having a daemon running is a good thing. I can try to add some text around that myself, but maybe you want to take a stab at it?
Second, I would REALLY like to cut off the blog post at "Smaller Images and better handling of secrets" and have the succeeding text be a second blog post, possibly with some small examples. Is this possible?
So, here's a PR for that post, with both of the changes I mention above, please review; #443
Thanks Josh, will take a look. @ipbabble and @rhatdan had put together the section about the secrets. I think you're right though, it would be better served in a follow up blog. I'll retain it in the googledoc, but let 's strike it from the post unless William or Dan have strong reactions against it.
I'll see what I can do about the daemon not being in place.
See the text I added to that section, if it works for you.
This post is now up. http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2017/06/introducing-buildah/