projectfluent/python-fluent

Release plan for fluent.runtime

spookylukey opened this issue · 4 comments

spookylukey commented

For want of a better place to put this, I'm making an issue for this.

What is the plan for releasing?

I suggest:

  1. Release fluent.runtime 0.1 to PyPI. It's got a working implementation, which is enough for now I think.
  2. Move README docs to Sphinx/readthedocs, at least for fluent.runtime. This shouldn't be too much work, I'm happy to do it for fluent.runtime.
  3. Release fluent.syntax to PyPI. I suggest keeping the same version number, or a minor bump, just changing the package name.
  4. Get fluent.runtime to work with latest version of fluent.syntax (i.e. Fluent 0.8 spec). I already have a branch for this.
  5. Do another release of fluent.runtime at this point.
  6. Look at the second, compiler implementation of FluentBundle, and other branches I'm working on (the escapers mechanism, for example) - this is a bit down the road, so we should decide at this point when we want to do releases for these additional features.

I'm assuming that @stasm or @Pike will be responsible for all releases of fluent.syntax, and I'm happy to be responsible for releasing fluent.runtime, or for you guys to do that.

stasm commented

Thanks for filing this, @spookylukey. The plan looks good. In fact, I may have jumped the gun when I published fluent.syntax 0.10 last week, but I hope it's all good. It's on PyPI, too.

I might need some help with setting up Sphinx/RTD for fluent.syntax. I'll try to follow fluent.runtime in that regard. Would you mind opening a PR with the changes you intend to do there for step 2?

I'm assuming that @stasm or @Pike will be responsible for all releases of fluent.syntax, and I'm happy to be responsible for releasing fluent.runtime, or for you guys to do that.

I'll be happy to continue doing it for fluent.syntax. And I'll also be happy if you did it for fluent.runtime :) Would you mind editing https://github.com/projectfluent/python-fluent/wiki/Publishing-to-PyPI at some point in the future, so that either of us can step in if you're not available? I know you mentioned that the publishing process of fluent.runtime would be a bit more complex due to its having different dependencies for different Python versions.

Would you like to publish fluent.runtime 0.1 today?

Pike commented

I'd love to also have a conversation about the post 0.1 story. How about opening a thread on that on discourse? That might be a good forum to chat about questions around 0.5 and 1.0 and dogfood and django-ftl or django-fluent etc ;-)

spookylukey commented

OK, great, I've released fluent.runtime 0.1. I didn't build binaries/wheels, just a tarball, which keeps the release instructions simple, we can add the wheels later. I've updated the wiki.

  • 🎉2
stasm commented

Yay for the first published release of fluent.runtime! Thanks, @spookylukey!