[FEATURE]: Add support for RestAssured.Net
basdijkstra opened this issue · 7 comments
Description
As an alternative to (not a replacement of!) using RestSharp, I’d like to suggest adding support for RestAssured.Net to Boa Constrictor.
I think support for a test-first library such as RestAssured.Net is a great alternative to have compared to supporting a general-purpose library like RestSharp.
Alternatives
N/A
Anything else?
As the creator of RestAssured.Net I’m more than happy to implement this addition myself.
In case of any required additions / improvements to RestAssured.Net for optimum integration, working on this myself will definitely streamline the process ;)
Commitments
- I agree to follow Boa Constrictor's Code of Conduct.
- I want to work on this issue myself. (This is voluntary, not required.)
Pinging @AutomationPanda. Any ideas or comments on this one?
Hey @basdijkstra! This is a great suggestion, and we'd be happy to welcome this contribution.
Awesome! I’ll get to work as soon as possible then. It might take me a while to send a PR but rest assured (bazinga!) I’m working on it.
So, in order to target netstandard2.0, RestAssured.Net itself also needs to target netstandard2.0, which it doesn't at the moment. I've done a quick check to see how easy or hard it would be to change compatibility in RestAssured.Net, and it's not trivial.
I'll have a good think first about whether netstandard2.0 compatibility is something I want to introduce.
Sure, no problem. Just let me know!
I won't be able to implement this support because RestAssured.Net does not target netstandard2.0, and I'm not going to either: basdijkstra/rest-assured-net#106
Thanks for considering it, though, @AutomationPanda !
Understood.