qstrahl/vim-matchmaker

Which is better, `:Matchmaker cmd` or `:MatchmakerCmd`?

Closed this issue · 2 comments

I'm considering adding tab completion to the :Matchmaker command (to complete on and off and any future commands), but I wonder if it would just be better to have a separate command for each, which seems to be the usual vim way of doing things. I welcome any input anyone has to offer.

I prefer :Matchmaker cmd because it makes cmd completition (wildmenu etc.) less annoying. With more commands starting with m wildmenu becomes more annoying to use due to extensive iteration.

I am pretty much sold on :Matchmaker cmd now, so I'm going to close this.