Applicability: Trying to avoid confusion when read in future years
Closed this issue · 0 comments
gorryfair commented
Three places where the text might avoid confusion when read in future years:
-
“Further downgrades to older TLS versions than used in QUIC, which is 1.3, “
… will it always be 1.3, or should this be “in QUIC [REF] is TLS 1.3” -
“Currently, QUIC only provides fully reliable stream transmission, which means that prioritization of retransmissions will be beneficial in most cases, by filling in gaps and freeing up the flow control window. “
- I'm not so happy with currently here: Is this the best way to say this, might it be better to say this rather than even hinting that future QUIC might only be reliable:
“When a QUIC endpoint provides provides fully reliable stream transmission, prioritization of retransmissions will be beneficial in most cases, by filling in gaps and freeing up the flow control window. “
- I’d prefer to see a ref here, since this something that the WG might later decide to work upon:
“Currently QUIC only supports failover cases [Quic-Transport].”