ramSeraph/indian_admin_boundaries

Pincode boundaries data seems noisy

nikhil-scholarlify opened this issue · 3 comments

nikhil-scholarlify commented

Thanks for all this amazing work! Just flagging an example case here.

https://github.com/ramSeraph/indian_admin_boundaries/releases/tag/postal

Preview link over Pune: https://indianopenmaps.fly.dev/not-so-open/pincodes/view#11.41/18.5303/73.8397

Many of the polygons aren't carrying any pincode value.
And most of Pune city is covered by a single polygon with value: 411045. That's certainly not the case.

image

ramSeraph commented

Hey.. maybe I should have clarified. This is what I could find on the postalgis site. This is just raw data. I didn't clean anything. That goes for all the data in this repo.

ramSeraph commented

I actually want to check if we are just looking at the village boundaries with pincode tagged to them. Anyway I will try add notes with your feedback atleast

ramSeraph commented

I did check the pincode boundaries against village boundaries.. they have common borders but they are not the same.

And I have updated the notes for pincode boundaries to reflect your feedback.