https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4918 instead of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2518
maulik-modi opened this issue · 3 comments
maulik-modi commented
Implement https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4918 instead of RFC2518
ramondeklein commented
Wish I knew of that one before, so I could have implemented it directly. Could you explain why you need RFC4918, so I can prioritize? I haven't had much time lately to work on NWebDAV and probably won't in the next few months. A PR would be very welcome.
maulik-modi commented
It is just that RFS2518 is obsolete. For new comers, RFC4918 should be the way to go.
hnnweb commented
it would be great with RFC4918 support as we are trying to implement WebDav for Word support using the Office URI scheme:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/client-developer/office-uri-schemes?redirectedfrom=MSDN.