ramondeklein/nwebdav

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4918 instead of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2518

maulik-modi opened this issue · 3 comments

ramondeklein commented

Wish I knew of that one before, so I could have implemented it directly. Could you explain why you need RFC4918, so I can prioritize? I haven't had much time lately to work on NWebDAV and probably won't in the next few months. A PR would be very welcome.

maulik-modi commented

It is just that RFS2518 is obsolete. For new comers, RFC4918 should be the way to go.

hnnweb commented

it would be great with RFC4918 support as we are trying to implement WebDav for Word support using the Office URI scheme:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/client-developer/office-uri-schemes?redirectedfrom=MSDN.

  • 👍1