eeptools build errors
macmpi opened this issue · 4 comments
macmpi commented
ninja: job failed: /usr/bin/gcc -Os -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -Wextra -Werror -Os -DNDEBUG -ffunction-sections -MD -MT eeptools/CMakeFiles/eepmake.dir/eeplib.c.o -MF eeptools/CMakeFiles/eepmake.dir/eeplib.c.o.d -o eeptools/CMakeFiles/eepmake.dir/eeplib.c.o -c /eeptools/eeplib.c
In file included from /eeptools/eeplib.c:5:
/eeptools/eeplib.c: In function 'eepio_start':
/eeptools/eeplib.h:26:21: error: implicit declaration of function 'be32toh' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
26 | #define HEADER_SIGN be32toh((((char)'R' << 24) | ((char)'-' << 16) | ((char)'P' << 8) | ((char)'i')))
| ^~~~~~~
/eeptools/eeplib.c:194:40: note: in expansion of macro 'HEADER_SIGN'
194 | eep_header.signature = HEADER_SIGN;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/eeptools/eeplib.c:206:42: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} and 'int' [-Werror=sign-compare]
206 | if (eep_header.signature != HEADER_SIGN)
| ^~
/eeptools/eeplib.c: In function 'eepio_end':
/eeptools/eeplib.c:237:25: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'long int' and 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Werror=sign-compare]
237 | if (pos != eep_header.eeplen)
| ^~
/eeptools/eeplib.c:239:29: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'long int' and 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Werror=sign-compare]
239 | if (pos_end != eep_header.eeplen)
| ^~
/eeptools/eeplib.c:241:29: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'long int' and 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Werror=sign-compare]
241 | if (pos_end != eep_header.eeplen)
| ^~
/eeptools/eeplib.c: In function 'eepio_atom_end':
/eeptools/eeplib.c:287:49: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'long int' and 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Werror=sign-compare]
287 | if (pos - eepio_atom_data_start != eep_atom_header.dlen)
| ^~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
ninja: job failed: /usr/bin/gcc -Os -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -Wextra -Werror -Os -DNDEBUG -ffunction-sections -MD -MT eeptools/CMakeFiles/eepdump.dir/eeplib.c.o -MF eeptools/CMakeFiles/eepdump.dir/eeplib.c.o.d -o eeptools/CMakeFiles/eepdump.dir/eeplib.c.o -c /eeptools/eeplib.c
In file included from /eeptools/eeplib.c:5:
/eeptools/eeplib.c: In function 'eepio_start':
/eeptools/eeplib.h:26:21: error: implicit declaration of function 'be32toh' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
26 | #define HEADER_SIGN be32toh((((char)'R' << 24) | ((char)'-' << 16) | ((char)'P' << 8) | ((char)'i')))
| ^~~~~~~
/eeptools/eeplib.c:194:40: note: in expansion of macro 'HEADER_SIGN'
194 | eep_header.signature = HEADER_SIGN;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/eeptools/eeplib.c:206:42: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} and 'int' [-Werror=sign-compare]
206 | if (eep_header.signature != HEADER_SIGN)
| ^~
/eeptools/eeplib.c: In function 'eepio_end':
/eeptools/eeplib.c:237:25: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'long int' and 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Werror=sign-compare]
237 | if (pos != eep_header.eeplen)
| ^~
/eeptools/eeplib.c:239:29: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'long int' and 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Werror=sign-compare]
239 | if (pos_end != eep_header.eeplen)
| ^~
/eeptools/eeplib.c:241:29: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'long int' and 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Werror=sign-compare]
241 | if (pos_end != eep_header.eeplen)
| ^~
/eeptools/eeplib.c: In function 'eepio_atom_end':
/eeptools/eeplib.c:287:49: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'long int' and 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Werror=sign-compare]
287 | if (pos - eepio_atom_data_start != eep_atom_header.dlen)
| ^~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
ninja: subcommands failed
pelwell commented
Which version of GCC is this? gcc-12 isn't complaining for me.
How are you building it using Ninja?
macmpi commented
looks fine yes 👍
Thanks.