license

[tdjastrzebski]

It is really nice work.
Have you considered changing to plain MIT license?

[rbuckton]

I haven't considered changing the license, no. You may want to check out https://esfx.js.org/#async, which is a more modular version of these async coordination primitives and is more up-to-date.

[tdjastrzebski]

Thank you for the hint. However, esfx is Apache 2.0 licensed as well.
Nothing against Apache 2.0 it is just that I am not a lawyer so I prefer simple terms.

[hax]

@tdjastrzebski

• https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/8135/can-i-use-mit-isc-apache-2-0-in-a-project-licensed-as-mit-or-apache-2-0

• https://medium.com/@robmuh/why-choose-apache-2-0-license-4253379b00ce

[tdjastrzebski]

I know, however neither of the authors takes any legal responsibility for what they advise so I prefer to rely on my own opinion and that is why MIT is more appealing.