reconverse/incidence2

Should an incidence object always be completed?

Closed this issue · 1 comments

Currently we have to call complete_counts() to fill unseen (not missing) values with 0 counts. Should this actually be a requirement of an incidence object.

Previous thinking was that for large linelists with lots of groupings this could be a little excessive.

Previous thinking was that for large linelists with lots of groupings this could be a little excessive.

Still the case