nm-vpn reports vnet0 as a connected vpn
Opened this issue · 7 comments
When running VMs on my laptop nv-vpn reports as being connected to vnet0 which seems odd.
LC_ALL=C nmcli -t connection show --active
:72b1520d-923c-47f9-9443-59c2d1829c13:802-11-wireless:wlp59s0
virbr0:aefcd86c-6a1a-4b89-b889-42b4fe3ca9f4:bridge:virbr0
vnet0:fa8b1a4f-91de-4a14-9c05-71d4c0233066:tun:vnet0
apt-cache policy i3xrocks-nm-vpn
i3xrocks-nm-vpn:
Installed: 3.0.18-1
Candidate: 3.0.18-1
Version table:
*** 3.0.18-1 500
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/regolith-linux/stable/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
There were some recent changes to the vpn block that are being published to the release
PPA today Chris. Can you verify after update if the issue still exists?
This does appear fixed in the latest release. Thanks Ken!
@kgilmer I think I spoke too soon.. It now shows vnet1
pt-cache policy i3xrocks-nm-vpn
i3xrocks-nm-vpn:
Installed: 3.0.21-1
Candidate: 3.0.21-1
Version table:
*** 3.0.21-1 500
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/regolith-linux/stable/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
I'm still seeing this with 3.2.1-1
Hi @cjohnston1158 , I do not use this type of VPN so am unsure of what the expected behavior is. Are you expecting to see wlp59s0
or something else?
It's not actually a vpn but a bridge.
I'm returning to this ticket because, judging from the output, the script does exactly what it's supposed to do. The VM is creating a tun
device (vnet0
) which NetworkManager
correctly identifies and manages.
You later said that vnet1
was being shown. Is that still the case? And is it really a device of type bridge
? Following the logic of the virtual network interfaces it should also be a tun
device.