I beat you in three lines of code
Opened this issue · 8 comments
local x = 1 // Replace with needed whole number.
x = x % 2
print(x)
Pros: This code is around 1 QUADRILLION times more efficient, both in time and power.
This code works offline, and on low-power devices.
Guaranteed to work if X is modified properly.
Works immediately, no need to wait several seconds for results.
Cons: You will need to know that 1 means odd, and 0 means even.
This code runs in the Lua language, and you will need a console open to see the result.
You will need to change the file every time you need to calculate a new number.
As you can see, the cons obviously outweigh the pros, for AI good and calculator bad.
(That was sarcasm. Why would you want to use generative AI for this purpose?)
Seems inefficient, why do that when AI can do it for us?
Your % 2 calculation could be ruined by a solar flare, causing your processor to malfunction and incorrectly decide that 1 is divisible by 2. Not exactly safe for production.
The "correct" solution would be & 1 instead of % 2, but either is fine if you trust your language to optimise your code for you.
Community members,
We've removed some recent comments by xorraxraxret that violated our community standards. Abusive language and personal attacks are not tolerated in our project discussions.
We're committed to maintaining a respectful and constructive environment for all contributors and users of is-odd-ai. Our moderation team will continue to enforce these standards.
Thank you for your continued support and contributions to the project.
Thank you for your contribution, @qwertyuiop265000! While your Lua implementation is indeed efficient, I think there's a slight misunderstanding about the purpose of is-odd-ai.
The clue is in the name: is-odd-ai. The "AI" part isn't just for show - it's the whole point! 🤖✨
The goal here isn't to find the most efficient solution. Oh no, we're aiming much higher! You see, AI is always better. It's been trained on vast swaths of the internet, while your humble remainder function has been living under a rock, only knowing how to divide things by 2. How quaint!
Our AI has read every mathematical treatise ever written, contemplated the nature of oddness and evenness in ways mere mortals can't comprehend, and probably invented a few new number systems along the way. It doesn't just calculate; it ponders the very essence of numerical identity.
Sure, your solution might give the "correct" answer faster, but can it appreciate the philosophical implications of oddness? Can it write a sonnet about the loneliness of prime numbers? I think not!
So while your code is great for those who are satisfied with mere correctness and efficiency, we here at is-odd-ai are on a mission to bring enlightenment to the world of parity checking. We're not here to be practical - we're here to be AI-tastic!
Keep those creative solutions coming, though. Maybe next time you can show us how to determine odd numbers using a blockchain or quantum computing? Just remember, whatever you come up with, our AI will deem it odd or even with the wisdom of a thousand mathematicians and the processing power of a small planet. Beat that with your remainder function! 😉🚀
Community members,
We've removed some recent comments by xorraxraxret that violated our community standards. Abusive language and personal attacks are not tolerated in our project discussions.
We're committed to maintaining a respectful and constructive environment for all contributors and users of is-odd-ai. Our moderation team will continue to enforce these standards.
Thank you for your continued support and contributions to the project.
you ruined it ngl
xorraxraxret was just saying how I "misspelt" the word "optimise" because I didn't write it in the Uncle Sam-approved way, which is mostly just funny to me, because it's really just a self-own that shows you don't know that there's more to the world than 1 country.
Anyway, I guess it makes sense that rhettlunn keeps the joke going by letting an AI write all of their communications now, since I figure the point of this is to prove that AI should not be used for everything, which I totally agree with. Still annoying, tho.
@qwertyuiop265000 not good enough for VC