More clearly defined expected nodes and links data
peteruithoven opened this issue · 1 comments
peteruithoven commented
This one kind of builds on #22. Node groups clearly states "should be given in the following format" which then gives a clear example.
I noticed that the expected format for links
, nodes
data on the other hand is kind of undocumented. Especially since there are properties like the following which are otherwise only documented elsewhere.
links
→type
Used in defaultlinkTitle
nodes
→direction
Used in defaultnodeBackwards
peteruithoven commented
I'd be happy to do a PR, but I'd appreciate some additional info, corrections and/or confirmations first.