Dispute text for GMC operations is not totally clear
Valdorff opened this issue · 1 comments
Valdorff commented
There are 3 bullets like this
- Anyone MAY file an RPIP disputing a grant, bounty, or retrospective award within two weeks of the announcement of recipients. Such an RPIP SHALL be subject to a snapshot vote.
- If a majority of the GMC agrees that a grant recipient is failing to provide the specified services to the protocol in a timely manner (as documented in the original application and in subsequent monthly updates), the GMC SHALL publicly announce such a decision and cease any future payments. This decision MAY be disputed by anyone through the creation of an RPIP within two weeks of the GMC’s announcement. The RPIP SHALL be subject to a snapshot vote.
- Any group or individual MAY submit a publicly-available document to the GMC claiming successful completion of the bounty. The GMC SHALL discuss all such applications. If a majority of the GMC agrees then the GMC SHALL announce the award of the bounty. Anyone MAY dispute the awarding of the bounty through the creation of an RPIP within two weeks of the GMC’s announcement. The RPIP SHALL be subject to a snapshot vote.
The term "creation an RPIP", is not as clear as it should be.
In discussion, https://discord.com/channels/405159462932971535/1143603646592987237/1143616540600717332, we thought it should be a merged Draft that was actively being pursued. This could be measured by having a Draft RPIP and an open sentiment poll.
Nichebiche commented
Niche