Stockfish support, extent?
OverLordGoldDragon opened this issue · 2 comments
These days, Nibbler more-or-less works with traditional engines like Stockfish, too.
What's "more-or-less"? What's it lack compared to Leela?
Can it replicate Lichess's Request a Computer Analysis feature? That is, given a PGN, (1) produce a win odds graph, (2) label moves as inaccuracy/mistake/blunder, (3) do focused evaluation on the move being observed, (4) ability to branch out in analysis board? See e.g. this game:
Nibbler is fairly basic, it can make a graph but won't explicitly label mistakes (though those will be fairly obvious from the graph swings). This is true regardless of using Leela / Stockfish. It can evaluation positions / moves but is strictly one board at a time.
For what it's worth, Lichess uses lichess-org/lila@133a1eb to distinguish between inaccuracy/mistake/blunder
Between #235 and #237 we could presumably get 95% of the way there