Jurgen comments
juberti opened this issue · 0 comments
juberti commented
While reading the document, I wrote down the following notes that the
editor may take into account when revising the document:
- in 3.1, expland SSRC on first usage and say that this is about
sending streams over RTP somewhere early on (I assume this is
implied by using the term WebRTC but for outsiders like me it may
help to be more specific).
Acknowledged.
-
stylistic: I am not a big fan of using citations like '[RFC2198]' as
ordinary words or nouns, it makes text difficult to follow unless
you know the RFC numbers by heart and your brain translates them
back to something meaningful on the fly. This makes texts more
difficult to read for outsiders. Example:This mechanism is similar to the
[RFC2198] mechanism described above.I prefer this:
This mechanism is similar to the
redundant encoding mechanism described above.There are couple of such usages of [RFCXXXX] in the document
OK.
- add reference for PCMU
OK. Reminder to self, RFC 5391.