sagenb 1.1.0
dimpase opened this issue · 25 comments
a routine update, incorporating most urgent PRs.
Also, in view of #25382
tarball:
https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/releases/download/1.1.0/sagenb-1.1.0.tar.bz2
Depends on #24692
Depends on #25382
CC: @kiwifb
Component: packages: standard
Author: Dima Pasechnik
Branch: 20b0980
Reviewer: François Bissey
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26499
should we also do the downgrade to optional here?
should we also do the downgrade to optional here?
You mean downgrading the spkg to optional? Is that actually possible already?
Could someone with python3 sage test this?
Replying to @dimpase:
Could someone with python3 sage test this?
There is no need to test with python3: I know that launching sagenb will fail when trying to import "email" module. I would say that py3-compatibility of sagenb has never been closer, but there is still work, and no worker to handle the task..
I'm adding docs, please stand by...
Description changed:
---
+++
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
a routine update, incorporating most urgent PRs.
-tarball: https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/releases/download/1.0.4/sagenb-1.0.4.tar.bz2
+Also, in view of #25382
+
+tarball:
+https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/releases/download/1.1.0/sagenb-1.1.0.tar.bz2Branch: u/dimpase/packages/sagenb110
New commits:
7adac2c | update sagenb to version 1.0.4 |
059de77 | trac 25382: remove the sagenb docs from the reference manual. |
591e91a | trac 25382 remove remaining crosslinks |
e2ff902 | Merge branch 'public/25382' of trac.sagemath.org:sage into nb104 |
80beebb | Upgrade GDB |
6769112 | updated SPKG.txt to note the need for makeinfo |
17ab2ce | Merge branch 'public/packages/optional/gdb82' of trac.sagemath.org:sage into nb104 |
0f1fbf2 | added docs of sagenb |
admittedly, docs are packed with few short autogenerated .rst files; if anyone is willing to tell me how to use sphinx to generate these, be my guest, I can fix this then.
I presume sagenb should now also depend on sphinx, there may be transitive dependency from something else but it is not visible.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
20b0980 | sphinx must be a dependency |
Replying to @kiwifb:
I presume sagenb should now also depend on sphinx, there may be transitive dependency from something else but it is not visible.
Indeed. Thanks for pointing this out. Fixed in the last commit.
Do we go ahead with this or are we waiting for further changes?
Well, I am waiting for a review on this ticket... :-)
Looks good to me then :)
Reviewer: François Bissey
Changed branch from u/dimpase/packages/sagenb110 to 20b0980
How was the "source tarball" https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/releases/download/1.1.0/sagenb-1.1.0.tar.bz2 created? It doesn't correspond with the github repo. In particular, the repo does not contain a bundled mathjax (as it should be), while the "source tarball" does.
Please comment at #26641.