sbmpost/AutoRaise

Mouse warp for same app's windows

Closed this issue ยท 8 comments

Hello, I have found "Mouse Warp" works when switching app(cmd+tab), not work on different windows of same app(cmd+`). It would be great if it also works for the same app too :) Thank you very much.

iShot_2024-03-10_14.47.22.mp4

Here is my setting
image

@fullstackneo

That would indeed be a very nice addition. I think it depends on whether the cmd-backtick key combination can be intercepted similar to cmd-tab. Also I am not sure if AutoRaise will be able to identify the window being activated.
It will need some research. Thanks for reporting!

@fullstackneo

Implemented in branch AutoRaise 4.8

Awesome. Thank you!

not sure if it's just me but i've just given version 5.1 a go (with alternative task switcher enabled) and am still seeing that the warp only works when source and destination are different apps (at least in the case of Firefox Developer Edition).
this was my config:

delay=0
focusDelay=0
warpX=0.5
warpY=0.5
altTaskSwitcher=true

@alexnguyennn

Currently the functionality only works without alternative task switcher. However this restriction may not be necessary. Something for AutoRaise 5.2 I suppose ;-)

thanks for the reply; just curious if the reopen and close with 5.2 release means that support for warping between same app windows using the alternative task switcher should be in?
just gave the new release a try and seeing the same behaviour, wondering if it's my config ๐Ÿ˜…

@alexnguyennn

thanks for the reply; just curious if the reopen and close with 5.2 release means that support for warping between same app windows using the alternative task switcher should be in?

๐Ÿ˜Š oops, closed this one too soon. Would it be possible to create a new issue for this? This way I won't confuse myself thinking this was already implemented ;-)

@alexnguyennn

thanks for the reply; just curious if the reopen and close with 5.2 release means that support for warping between same app windows using the alternative task switcher should be in?

๐Ÿ˜Š oops, closed this one too soon. Would it be possible to create a new issue for this? This way I won't confuse myself thinking this was already implemented ;-)

certainly - made #208 . thanks in advance!